3 Facts: Why Pipelines are Good for the Environment

3 Facts: Why Pipelines are Good for the Environment

If a petroleum refinery was a beating heart, transmission pipelines would be the veins bringing blood to and from. Truth is that pipelines are the lifeblood of our modern society, as they are the mechanism that allows us to ship oil and natural gas safely and effectively which is used for heating our homes to making petrochemical products to fueling our vehicles and everything in between.

In Canada, there’s a vast network of pipelines that transport millions of litres of oil and gas under ground every single day. Pipelines are often misunderstood, mistaken as being dangerous or harmful to the environment in every aspect. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

Here’s a few reasons why pipelines are good for the environment, and why you should consider being supportive of projects in Canada such as the Trans Mountain Expansion and Coastal GasLink.


#1 - Pipelines Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Global Oil Demand is Growing: The World Needs More Canada!

According to U.S. Energy Information Administration, global demand for oil is forecast to grow by 2.97 million barrels per day in 2019 and 2020 combined.

While some believe oil demand will peak sometime soon (various organizations predict peak oil between anywhere from 2021 to 2040) due to new electric passenger car vehicles and renewable electricity production, demand for oil in transportation and petrochemicals is not going away anytime soon.

The need to transport oil and gas safely and effectively in pipelines is not going anywhere sometime soon either.

It’s been shown that when it comes to transporting oil and gas, pipelines are the least greenhouse gas (GHG) intensive way to do so. In one study, The Faculty of Engineering at the University of Alberta found that pipelines reduced GHG emissions by anywhere between 61 to 77 per cent versus rail for transporting oil and gas long distances.

Anti-pipeline activists argue that building pipelines increases emissions because of increased production and transportation capacity. While this is true, global oil demand is growing and if it doesn’t come from Canada, it will come from somewhere else.

Without pipelines oil will just be transported using a different means such as rail, as shown in Alberta where many producers have ramped up oil-by-rail due to restricted pipeline capacity. This is harming the environment by putting more GHGs in our atmosphere versus if this oil was being transported by a new pipeline.


#2 - Pipelines are the Safest Way to Transport Oil and Gas

A study done by the Fraser Institute shows that pipelines are much safer than rail for transporting oil and gas. Shown in this study is a much lower incident rate per million barrels of oil and gas transported for pipelines versus rail. The facts:

Every year between 2003 and 2013, pipelines experienced 0.049 accidents or spills per million barrels of oil, versus 0.227 for rail. In short, this means that transporting oil by rail was 4.5 more times likely to have an occurrence than a pipeline.

Furthermore, the study found that a large majority of the pipeline incidents resulted in a spill of 1 cubic metre or less, and that 83 per cent of these took place in a facility which likely has secondary containment procedures and mechanisms.

Perhaps one of the most telling statistics from the study is that 99 percent of pipeline incidents that did happen did not harm the environment.


#3 - Pipelines Transport Oil and Gas in Safe Corridors

Canadian Pipeline Delays = Third-World SystemWhen pipelines are built, they are typically pathed away from communities. Unfortunately, when oil is shipped by rail, trains travel through multiple municipalities as they transport their freight from point A to point B.  

Transporting oil by rail is deemed to be quite safe, but as mentioned above, it’s still 4.5 times more likely that an incident occurs versus pipelines. And in many cases the rail incidents that do occur have the potential to be in a town or village where the consequences could be catastrophic.

Look at the Lac-Mègantic rail disaster as an example. In 2013, a 74-car freight train carrying crude oil from the United States derailed in downtown Lac-Mègantic, resulting in the death of 47 people. Is it possible that this disaster could have been avoided if there were a pipeline transporting this oil instead?

An important lesson to be learned from such a terrible tragedy is that while oil-by-rail sends tanker trains through various communities along the way, pipelines do not. When pipeline incidents occur, rarely is any human life in danger, if at all.

If you value human life, you support oil being transported by pipelines instead of rail!

Share this Blog Post

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

286774 People Strong & Counting ...

Canadian-centered campaigns, projects and actions.
Email is how Canada Action connects. Join in and get started and be heard: