
Despite predictions of "peak oil" over the years, growing global oil demand seems here to stay, at least in the short to medium term. Following the global energy crisis of 2021 – and its 2022 sequel – it's clear the world will need all forms of supply to keep the lights on and the economy rolling for families around the world.
Given continued growing demand and healthy reserves, it’s worth underlining the fact there’s recently a move away from short-term "peak oil" scenarios.
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that oppose fossil fuels celebrated the idea that the "end of oil" was in sight as the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its Net Zero by 2050 pathway last May. Now, more than six months later, the IEA and other similar organizations see global oil demand roaring back, thereby largely disproving the NGO statements.
It’s odd, in that context, that opponents of Canada's energy sector continue to send out messages like the one tweeted below. We know the below statement is suspect given its reference to 2040 doesn’t line up with its link that makes claims about 2050. But in our effort to encourage balanced, fact-based and informed conversations about Canada's world-class resources sector, it’s important to point out that there are even more problems with the tweet below than just that.
#futurescape @IEA shows demand for oil falling by 75% by 2040. Chris Severson-Baker says this will have a big impact on oil production & price in #Alberta. Future starts now https://t.co/WhlJtGA046
— Pembina Institute (@Pembina) December 27, 2021
Let’s go through those problems, point by point.




