U.S. Could Still Build Keystone XL, Decreasing Long-Term Need for Unfriendly Oil Suppliers

The U.S. Could Have Built Keystone XL, Instead Chooses Less Reliable Suppliers KXL cover

Several suggestions from the U.S. over the past several months that it may scale down sanctions on Venezuela to increase oil supplies should make us all think of the Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline. The now-defunct project could have been a stable and reliable source of oil for U.S. refineries for decades.

The 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil shipped by KXL to our closest ally and trade partner would have made it an irreplaceable asset, especially amid today’s global energy shortages.

For those wondering, the pipeline would likely have been more than enough to offset volumes of crude oil coming into the U.S. from Russia earlier in 2022, before Russian energy was outright banned by Congress [1]. Today, it would negate the need for the U.S. to look to Venezuela and other OPEC producers for more oil.

Current global events make you wonder if the Americans are thinking twice about their decision to quash the pipeline.

Joe Manchin says that the U.S. should build Keystone XL for energy security and to reduce reliance on foreign autocratic oil

OPEC’s recent announcement to cut oil production by 2 million barrels per day (bpd) is just one of several examples that make the KXL cancellation likely to be a regrettable one for the U.S.

KXL could in fact be revived if the Biden administration were willing to reinstate its presidential permit. After all, Canada has proven itself a stable and reliable source for U.S. refiners. Additionally, the project has already finished construction in Canada, drastically reducing the time needed for completion south of the border.

However, reviving KXL has proven difficult. The backlash from environmentalists that effectively pushed for the pipeline’s shutdown – groups which have indirectly contributed to mass global energy shortages in the process  – would be severe, no doubt.

Instead, the Americans have opted to ask for more oil production from Venezuela.

There is a catch, of course, which may prove to be too "dangerous" for President Nicolas Maduro’s authoritarian regime to survive.

The U.S. has said that in exchange for significant sanctions relief, Maduro’s government must resume long-suspended talks with the country’s opposition to discuss conditions required to hold free and fair presidential elections in 2024 [2]. All this also must happen in "good faith," according to The Wall Street Journal.

This begs anyone to ask these questions:

> Why is the U.S. even contemplating relying yet on another dictator for energy?

> Have we not learned anything from the 2022 war in Ukraine?

> Can we trust Maduro to keep a promise that would threaten his government's very existence while also potentially subjecting him to punishment just as severe?

To add, Venezuela’s embattled energy companies have in recent years entered into partnerships with Russian oil producers, while the two countries have strengthened ties according to the New York Times. Therefore, asking Venezuela for more oil also offers a financial lifeline to Russia [3].

Let’s compare Canada and Venezuela in a straightforward and logical way, shall we? How do the two countries stack up against one another on various Environmental, Social and Governance indices? Here's a glance:

Green Future Index 2022

  • Venezuela: N/A
  • Canada: 15th

Social Progress Index 2021

  • Venezuela: N/A
  • Canada: 6th

Democracy Index 2021

  • Venezuela: 151st
  • Canada: 12th

Human Freedom Index 2021

  • Venezuela: 164th
  • Canada: 6th

Sustainable Development Report 2022

  • Venezuela: 120th
  • Canada: 29th

In case you’re wondering, non-applicable (N/A) typically means that country chose not to participate in the index or provide the data required to be ranked accordingly. It’s not uncommon for autocratic rulers to opt out of ESG-related rankings for reasons that are obvious.

Hence, it is highly nonsensical to continue to let energy dollars flow to oil and gas producers that do not care about civil liberties, human rights and the environment. The chance that this capital will be used to continue to oppress everyday Venezuelans and support the longevity of Maduro’s dictatorial regime is high.

If only the U.S. would look north to Canada, home to vast oil and natural gas reserves that already play a large role in underpinning the American economy.

Canada can do more – way more – not just for the U.S., but also for our allies and trade partners across oceans.

Global oil and gas demand is growing. Who would you choose to buy your energy supplies from? Would it be free and fair democracies like Canada, or brutal regimes like the one currently in power in Venezuela?

It’s time that the U.S. stop looking to other less stable, reliable and sustainable producers for its energy needs. Canada is right here waiting.

Let's build the U.S. section of Keystone XL and put some of our energy supply shortage concerns behind us for good.

Canada Action - I Love Oil and Gas


1 – The White House – FACT SHEET: United States Bans Imports of Russian Oil, Liquefied Natural Gas, and Coal, Date Accessed: October 2022 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/08/fact-sheet-united-states-bans-imports-of-russian-oil-liquefied-natural-gas-and-coal/)

2 – The Wall Street Journal – U.S. Looks to Ease Venezuela Sanctions, Enabling Chevron to Pump Oil, Date Accessed: October 2022 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-plans-to-ease-venezuela-sanctions-enabling-chevron-to-pump-oil-11665005719)

3 – Forbes – Why Biden’s Killing Of Keystone XL Was An Energy Security Blunder, Date Accessed: October 2022 (https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2022/03/10/why-bidens-killing-of-keystone-xl-was-a-big-energy-blunder/?sh=3a89ca3413fd)

Share this page to spread the word.

Related Posts

Top 3 Trans Mountain Myths Debunked

Top 3 Trans Mountain Myths Debunked

The Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) is a pipeline underway in Western Canada which will transport petroleum liquids west to domestic refineries as well as for export abroad. Like all other Canadian pipelines, TMX has met stiff opposition from activists who have spoken several ...

3 Reasons Why Insurance Companies Should Support Canadian Pipelines

3 Reasons Why Insurance Companies Should Support Canadian Pipelines

Lloyd's of London syndicate Aspen Insurance announced this past month it would cut ties with the Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMP) when the project's insurance policy expires this summer. According to pipeline opponents, it is the 17th company to do so – largely a result of activ...

20 Facts You Didn't Know About Canadian Pipelines

20 Facts You Didn't Know About Canadian Pipelines

Oil and gas pipelines in Canada have been a frequent topic of discussion in the public domain for a decade or more. While most of us have a good idea of their purpose and the energy abundance they afford us, not everyone is on the same page about the necessity of Canada’s hug...