
What happens exactly when Canada fails to develop its natural resources, and who is better off for it? – (HINT: it sure isn’t Canadians).
Anti-development obstructionists in Canada would have us believe that cancelling an oil pipeline, shutting down a mining project, or preventing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility from getting approved is somehow a big win because these energy resources will not be developed.
But that’s just not the case.
Over the past decade, Canada has seen numerous forestry, mining, and energy projects cancelled or suspended worth nearly $670 billion – despite growing global demand for all of the above. This lost capital, if kept in Canada, would have created good jobs, supported homegrown businesses, and generated government revenues to help pay for our social programs such as education and healthcare for decades to come.
It is imperative Canadians understand that when we fail to build resource projects, we forfeit the immense economic opportunities that come with them—which are absolutely precious and irreplaceable contributors to our economic strength and overall prosperity.
Below, we look at several examples of Canada failing to capitalize on resource projects, only to see capital investment and the economic benefits go elsewhere abroad (in no particular order).












